United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement (1918–1920): A Peasant Uprising for Justice

 

United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement (1918–1920): A Peasant Uprising for Justice

The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement (1918–1920) was a significant peasant uprising in the Awadh region of the erstwhile United Provinces (now Uttar Pradesh, India). Spearheaded by leaders like Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi, this movement was a powerful expression of the grievances of farmers against oppressive agrarian policies and exploitative landlordism. Supported by prominent figures like Madan Mohan Malaviya, the movement laid the foundation for organized peasant resistance in India. This detailed note explores the reasons for the movement’s inception, its course, and its results, presenting the narrative in simple, engaging, and eloquent language.

Introduction: A Cry for Justice

In the early 20th century, the lush fields of Awadh, known as the "granary of India," hid a harsh reality. Beneath the fertile soil lay the struggles of millions of peasants burdened by high rents, illegal levies, and the constant threat of eviction. The United Provinces Kisan Sabha, established in February 1918 in Lucknow, emerged as a beacon of hope for these farmers. Led by Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi, with the backing of Madan Mohan Malaviya, the Sabha united peasants from diverse agricultural castes to demand justice. This movement was not just a protest; it was a call for dignity, fairness, and freedom from exploitation. Over two years, it grew from a small organization to a formidable force, setting the stage for future peasant struggles in India.

Reasons for Inception: The Roots of Discontent

The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement was born out of deep-rooted grievances that plagued the agrarian society of Awadh. Several factors converged to ignite this uprising:

Oppressive Land Tenure System:
After the Revolt of 1857, the British reinstated the taluqdars (large landlords) in Awadh, granting them control over vast tracts of land. This strengthened their grip over the peasantry. Tenants faced exorbitant rents, often as high as 50–75% of their produce. The taluqdars also imposed illegal levies, such as nazrana (renewal fees) and begar (unpaid labor), which pushed peasants into perpetual debt and poverty.

Economic Hardships Post-World War I:
The First World War (1914–1918) had a devastating impact on the rural economy. The British government’s wartime policies led to a sharp rise in the prices of food and essential commodities. While landlords hoarded profits, peasants struggled to afford basic necessities. The war also disrupted agricultural markets, leaving farmers with little income to pay rents or taxes.

Summary Evictions (Bedakhali):
The practice of bedakhali—arbitrary eviction from land—was widespread. Peasants who failed to pay rent or comply with the taluqdars’ demands were summarily evicted, losing their only source of livelihood. This created a climate of fear and insecurity among cultivators.

Influence of Home Rule Movement:
The Home Rule Movement, led by Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak, inspired political awakening across India. In the United Provinces, Home Rule activists, including Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi, saw the plight of peasants as part of the broader struggle against British colonialism. They mobilized farmers to form Kisan Sabhas, blending agrarian grievances with the call for self-governance.

Lack of Legal Protections:
The British administration offered little recourse for peasants. The legal system favored landlords, and courts were inaccessible to illiterate and impoverished farmers. This lack of justice fueled resentment and the need for collective action.

These factors created a volatile situation, ripe for organized resistance. Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi, both educated and socially conscious leaders, recognized the urgency of uniting peasants to challenge this exploitation. With the moral and political support of Madan Mohan Malaviya, a respected nationalist leader, they laid the foundation for the United Provinces Kisan Sabha.

Course of the Movement: A Journey of Resistance

The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement unfolded in distinct phases, marked by organization, mobilization, and escalation. Its journey from 1918 to 1920 was a testament to the resilience and unity of the peasantry.

Phase 1: Formation and Early Organization (1918–1919)

Establishment of the Sabha: In February 1918, Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi founded the United Provinces Kisan Sabha in Lucknow. Madan Mohan Malaviya, a prominent figure in the Indian National Congress, lent his support, giving the movement credibility and visibility. The Sabha aimed to address peasant grievances, including high rents, illegal levies, and evictions.

Rapid Expansion: By June 1919, the Sabha had established 450 branches across the United Provinces, reflecting its widespread appeal. It attracted peasants from both high and low castes, creating a broad-based coalition. Leaders like Jhinguri Singh, Durgapal Singh, and Baba Ramchandra emerged as key figures, mobilizing rural communities.

Methods of Mobilization: The Sabha organized mass meetings, where leaders educated peasants about their rights and encouraged collective action. Home Rule activists played a crucial role in spreading the message, linking peasant struggles to the national movement for independence.

Phase 2: Growing Momentum and Nationalist Involvement (1919–1920)

Congress Session in Delhi (1918): A large number of peasants from the United Provinces attended the Indian National Congress session in Delhi in December 1918. Their participation highlighted the agrarian crisis and brought their issues to the attention of national leaders.

Baba Ramchandra’s Influence: Baba Ramchandra, a charismatic leader from Maharashtra, became a pivotal figure in the movement. He recited verses from the Ramcharitmanas to inspire peasants, infusing the struggle with cultural and spiritual resonance. His leadership bridged the gap between rural masses and urban nationalists.

Nehru’s Engagement: In June 1920, Baba Ramchandra urged Jawaharlal Nehru to visit the villages of Awadh. Nehru’s tours fostered a deep connection with the peasantry, strengthening the movement’s ties with the Indian National Congress. His presence also amplified the Sabha’s demands on a national stage.

Phase 3: Formation of Awadh Kisan Sabha (October 1920)

Split in Nationalist Ranks: Differences among nationalists led to the formation of the Awadh Kisan Sabha in October 1920, led by Baba Ramchandra, Jawaharlal Nehru, and others. This new organization focused specifically on the Awadh region, where exploitation was most acute.

Radical Demands: The Awadh Kisan Sabha issued a bold manifesto, urging peasants to:

Refuse to till bedakhali land (land from which tenants had been evicted).

Stop providing hari and begar (unpaid labor).

Boycott landlords who refused to comply with these conditions.

Resolve disputes through village panchayats, bypassing colonial courts.

Mass Mobilization: The Sabha organized large rallies and protests, drawing thousands of peasants. These gatherings were peaceful but resolute, signaling the growing strength of the movement.

Phase 4: Escalation and Repression (Late 1920–1921)

Shift to Direct Action: By January 1921, the movement took a more confrontational turn. Frustrated by the lack of response from landlords and the British administration, peasants resorted to looting bazaars, granaries, and houses of exploitative landlords. Clashes with the police became frequent, marking a shift from non-violent mobilization to sporadic violence.

British Repression: The colonial authorities responded with force, arresting leaders and suppressing protests. The heavy-handed response aimed to dismantle the Sabha’s organizational structure and intimidate peasants.

Despite these challenges, the movement sustained its momentum until 1921, when the broader Non-Cooperation Movement, launched by Mahatma Gandhi, absorbed much of its energy. The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement, however, left an indelible mark on India’s agrarian and nationalist history.

Results: A Legacy of Empowerment

The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement did not achieve all its immediate objectives, but its impact was profound and far-reaching. Its results can be categorized into immediate outcomes and long-term legacies.

Immediate Outcomes

Raised Awareness: The movement brought the plight of Awadh’s peasants to the forefront of national consciousness. It highlighted the link between agrarian distress and colonial exploitation, influencing the Indian National Congress to prioritize peasant issues.

Strengthened Peasant Unity: The Sabha’s ability to unite peasants across caste lines was a significant achievement. It fostered a sense of collective identity and solidarity among cultivators, empowering them to challenge landlordism.

Limited Concessions: While systemic reforms were not immediately implemented, the movement pressured some landlords to reduce rents and illegal levies in certain areas, providing temporary relief to peasants.

Integration with Nationalist Movement: The involvement of leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and the participation of peasants in Congress sessions strengthened the alliance between the agrarian and nationalist movements. This laid the groundwork for future collaborations.

Long-Term Legacies

Foundation for Future Peasant Movements: The United Provinces Kisan Sabha inspired the formation of other peasant organizations, such as the All India Kisan Sabha in 1936. Its emphasis on collective action and anti-landlordism influenced agrarian struggles across India.

Influence on Land Reforms: The movement’s demands for fair rents and tenant rights contributed to post-independence land reforms. The Zamindari Abolition Act of 1950 in Uttar Pradesh can trace its ideological roots to early peasant uprisings like this one.

Empowerment of Rural Masses: By giving peasants a platform to voice their grievances, the Sabha instilled a sense of agency. This empowerment encouraged rural communities to participate in the freedom struggle and demand their rights.

Legacy of Leadership: Leaders like Gauri Shankar Mishra, Indra Narayan Dwivedi, and Baba Ramchandra became symbols of resistance. Their efforts inspired future generations of activists to champion the cause of the marginalized.


Key Figures: Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi

Gauri Shankar Mishra: A Home Rule activist and lawyer, Mishra was instrumental in organizing the Sabha. His ability to connect with peasants and articulate their grievances made him a respected leader. He worked tirelessly to expand the Sabha’s network, ensuring its reach across rural Awadh.

Indra Narayan Dwivedi: A scholar and nationalist, Dwivedi brought intellectual rigor to the movement. He collaborated with Mishra to draft demands and mobilize support. His leadership helped bridge the gap between urban nationalists and rural peasants.

Madan Mohan Malaviya: While not a founding member, Malaviya’s support was crucial. As a prominent Congress leader and founder of Banaras Hindu University, he lent legitimacy to the movement and advocated for peasant rights at the national level.

Together, these leaders transformed the United Provinces Kisan Sabha into a powerful force for change, inspiring peasants to dream of a fairer future.


Conclusion: A Movement That Echoes Today

The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement (1918–1920) was a radiant chapter in India’s history, where ordinary peasants, guided by visionary leaders, stood up against injustice. Born out of the anguish of exploitation, it grew into a mighty wave of resistance, challenging the might of landlords and the British Raj. Though it faced setbacks, its legacy endures in the form of empowered rural communities, inspired nationalist movements, and a vision for equitable land reforms.

Gauri Shankar Mishra and Indra Narayan Dwivedi, with their unwavering commitment, lit a spark that illuminated the path for future struggles. Their work reminds us that even in the darkest times, the collective voice of the oppressed can shake the foundations of tyranny. The United Provinces Kisan Sabha Movement was not just a protest; it was a promise—a promise of dignity, justice, and a better tomorrow for India’s farmers.

 

Kheda Satyagraha (1918): A Landmark Movement in India’s Freedom Struggle

 

Kheda Satyagraha (1918): A Landmark Movement in India’s Freedom Struggle

The Kheda Satyagraha of 1918 stands as a shining chapter in India’s journey toward independence, showcasing the power of nonviolent resistance under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi and the courage of local leaders like Mohanlal Pandya. This movement, rooted in the principles of truth and non-cooperation, was a bold stand by the farmers of Kheda, Gujarat, against unjust British colonial policies. The satyagraha not only highlighted the struggles of the rural poor but also strengthened the Indian National Movement by uniting people across classes and communities. These notes explore the reasons for the inception of the Kheda Satyagraha, its course, and its significant results, presented in a clear, simple, and engaging manner.

Reasons for the Inception of the Kheda Satyagraha

The Kheda Satyagraha was born out of deep economic distress and the unfair policies imposed by the British colonial government. Several factors came together to spark this movement:

Agricultural Crisis Due to Natural Calamities
The year 1917 brought severe hardships to the farmers of Kheda district in Gujarat. Heavy monsoon rains led to widespread flooding, destroying crops like cotton, tobacco, and grains. This disaster left the peasants, already struggling to make ends meet, in a state of despair. With their fields ruined, they had little to sell or eat, making it nearly impossible to pay the land revenue demanded by the British authorities.

Unjust Revenue Demands
The British colonial government followed a rigid land revenue system that required farmers to pay a fixed amount of tax regardless of their crop yield. In 1917–18, despite the crop failure, the government refused to waive or reduce the revenue demand. The peasants pleaded for remission (a partial or complete waiver of taxes), as was customary under British rules when crops failed, but their requests were ignored. This insensitivity fueled anger and resentment among the farmers.

Economic Exploitation and Poverty
The farmers of Kheda were already burdened by years of economic exploitation under colonial rule. High taxes, low crop prices, and dependence on moneylenders trapped them in a cycle of debt. The refusal to grant tax relief in a year of famine-like conditions was seen as a cruel injustice, pushing the peasants to the brink of rebellion.

Emergence of Mahatma Gandhi’s Leadership
By 1918, Mahatma Gandhi had emerged as a prominent leader in India’s freedom struggle, having successfully led the Champaran Satyagraha in 1917. His philosophy of satyagraha—nonviolent resistance based on truth and justice—inspired the people of Kheda. Gandhi’s return to Gujarat, his home state, gave the farmers hope that their grievances would be heard. Local leaders like Mohanlal Pandya, a dedicated social worker, rallied the peasants and sought Gandhi’s guidance to organize a nonviolent protest.

Growing Nationalist Sentiments
The early 20th century saw a surge in nationalist feelings across India. People were increasingly aware of the exploitative nature of British rule and were eager to challenge it. The Kheda Satyagraha became a platform for the peasants to express their discontent not only with local revenue policies but also with the broader colonial system. The movement was as much about economic justice as it was about asserting Indian dignity and self-respect.

These factors—natural calamity, economic hardship, colonial indifference, and the rise of inspiring leadership—set the stage for the Kheda Satyagraha, a movement that would test the resilience of the farmers and the power of nonviolent resistance.

Course of the Kheda Satyagraha

The Kheda Satyagraha unfolded as a carefully planned and disciplined movement, guided by Mahatma Gandhi and executed with the active participation of local leaders and peasants. Its course can be traced through the following phases:

Initial Mobilization and Investigation (Early 1918)
In late 1917, the farmers of Kheda began voicing their inability to pay the land revenue due to crop failure. Mohanlal Pandya, a respected local leader, took the lead in organizing the peasants and bringing their plight to the attention of nationalist leaders. Gandhi, who had recently returned to Gujarat after the Champaran success, was approached for support.
Gandhi began by conducting a detailed survey of the affected villages in Kheda. Accompanied by Mohanlal Pandya and other volunteers, he visited hundreds of villages to assess the extent of crop damage and the economic condition of the farmers. The survey confirmed that the crop yield was far below the threshold required for revenue payment, justifying the demand for remission. Armed with this evidence, Gandhi appealed to the British authorities to suspend the tax collection, but the government remained unmoved.

Launch of the Satyagraha (March 1918)
When negotiations with the British failed, Gandhi called for a satyagraha—a nonviolent refusal to pay the revenue. On March 22, 1918, the Kheda Satyagraha was formally launched. Gandhi urged the farmers to pledge not to pay the tax, even if it meant facing severe consequences like confiscation of their land and property. The movement was grounded in the principles of satyagraha: truth, nonviolence, and collective unity.
Mohanlal Pandya played a crucial role in mobilizing the peasants, organizing meetings, and spreading Gandhi’s message of courage and resistance. Other local leaders, such as Vallabhbhai Patel, Narhari Parikh, and Ravi Shankar Vyas, joined the movement, strengthening its grassroots network. The satyagraha gained widespread support, with thousands of farmers, including both small peasants and wealthier landowners, pledging their allegiance.

Challenges and Repression
The British authorities responded harshly to the satyagraha. They began confiscating the property of farmers who refused to pay the tax, seizing cattle, household goods, and even standing crops. In some cases, entire villages faced punitive measures. The government also arrested key leaders, including Mohanlal Pandya, to weaken the movement.
Despite these hardships, the farmers remained steadfast. Gandhi and his team provided moral and practical support, encouraging the peasants to endure the repression without resorting to violence. Women, too, played a significant role, participating in protests and supporting their families during the crisis. The unity and discipline of the satyagrahis became a powerful symbol of resistance.

Sustained Resistance and Negotiations
As the satyagraha continued, the British authorities began to feel the pressure. The movement garnered attention across India, with newspapers and nationalist leaders highlighting the plight of Kheda’s farmers. The government’s refusal to grant remission was increasingly seen as unjust, even by some British officials.
Gandhi maintained a dual strategy: sustaining the nonviolent protest while keeping the door open for dialogue. He advised the farmers to pay the tax only if they could afford it without compromising their dignity, ensuring that the movement remained inclusive and practical. This approach prevented the satyagraha from becoming rigid or divisive.

Resolution (June 1918)
By June 1918, the British authorities, under mounting pressure, agreed to a compromise. They announced that the revenue collection would be suspended for the poorest farmers, and those who had already paid would not face further demands. While the government did not formally admit defeat, the partial remission was a significant victory for the satyagrahis. The confiscated property was returned, and the farmers’ dignity was restored.
Gandhi called off the satyagraha, emphasizing that the movement had achieved its core objective: securing relief for the most vulnerable farmers. The Kheda Satyagraha thus concluded on a note of triumph, proving the effectiveness of nonviolent resistance.

Results of the Kheda Satyagraha

The Kheda Satyagraha had far-reaching consequences, not only for the farmers of Kheda but also for India’s broader freedom struggle. Its results can be categorized into immediate outcomes and long-term impacts:

Immediate Relief for Farmers
The most tangible result was the relief granted to the farmers of Kheda. The British government’s decision to suspend revenue collection for the poorest peasants and return confiscated property alleviated the immediate economic burden. This victory restored the farmers’ faith in their ability to challenge injustice through collective action.

Strengthening of Gandhi’s Leadership
The Kheda Satyagraha solidified Mahatma Gandhi’s position as a national leader. His success in leading a grassroots movement against colonial authorities demonstrated the power of satyagraha as a tool for mass mobilization. The movement also brought Gandhi closer to the rural masses, establishing him as a champion of the poor.

Emergence of Local Leaders
The satyagraha highlighted the leadership of figures like Mohanlal Pandya and Vallabhbhai Patel. Pandya’s tireless efforts in organizing the peasants earned him widespread respect, while Patel’s involvement in Kheda marked the beginning of his rise as a key figure in the Indian National Congress. These leaders became pillars of the freedom struggle in Gujarat and beyond.

Spread of Nationalist Consciousness
The Kheda Satyagraha awakened a sense of unity and nationalism among the people of Gujarat. It showed that ordinary farmers could resist colonial oppression and demand their rights. The movement inspired other regions to adopt similar nonviolent protests, spreading the spirit of resistance across India.

Legitimization of Satyagraha as a Strategy
The success of the Kheda Satyagraha validated satyagraha as an effective method of protest. It proved that nonviolent resistance could force a powerful colonial government to concede without bloodshed. This approach became a cornerstone of India’s freedom struggle, influencing movements like the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–22) and the Salt Satyagraha (1930).

Social Unity and Empowerment
The movement bridged divides between different social groups, including peasants, landowners, and urban intellectuals. It also empowered marginalized communities, including women, who participated actively in the protests. This inclusivity strengthened the social fabric of the nationalist movement.

Long-Term Impact on Colonial Policy
The Kheda Satyagraha exposed the flaws in the British revenue system and forced the colonial government to reconsider its approach to tax collection during times of crisis. While the British did not overhaul their policies immediately, the movement set a precedent for future negotiations and concessions.

Conclusion

The Kheda Satyagraha of 1918 was a remarkable episode in India’s fight for freedom, blending the simplicity of rural life with the grandeur of a united struggle. Under the inspiring leadership of Mahatma Gandhi and the dedicated efforts of Mohanlal Pandya, the farmers of Kheda stood firm against injustice, wielding the weapon of nonviolence with unwavering resolve. The movement’s inception was rooted in genuine grievances—crop failure, economic hardship, and colonial indifference. Its course demonstrated the power of collective action, discipline, and moral courage. The results, both immediate and long-term, left an indelible mark on India’s freedom struggle, proving that truth and unity could triumph over oppression.

The legacy of the Kheda Satyagraha lives on as a testament to the resilience of ordinary people and the transformative potential of nonviolent resistance. It reminds us that even in the face of great adversity, a just cause, pursued with sincerity and solidarity, can move mountains. For students of history and champions of justice alike, the Kheda Satyagraha remains a beacon of hope and inspiration, illuminating the path to a freer, fairer world.