The Paika Rebellion (1817): A Tale of Courage and Resistance Led by Bakshi Jagabandhu

 

The Paika Rebellion (1817): A Tale of Courage and Resistance Led by Bakshi Jagabandhu

The Paika Rebellion of 1817, also known as the Paika Bidroha, stands tall as one of India’s earliest and most inspiring struggles against British colonial rule. This armed uprising, centered in Odisha’s Khurda region, was a bold cry for freedom led by the valiant Bakshi Jagabandhu Bidyadhara Mohapatra Bhramarbara Raya, fondly called Buxi Jagabandhu. The rebellion was not just a fight for land or rights but a symbol of Odia unity, with Lord Jagannath as its spiritual beacon. This elaborate note explores the reasons behind the rebellion’s inception, its gripping course, and its significant outcomes, weaving a narrative that is both informative and engaging for competitive exams.

Introduction: The Dawn of Resistance

In the early 19th century, Odisha was a land of rich culture and proud traditions, ruled by the Gajapati kings and protected by their loyal militia, the Paikas. These warrior-farmers, known for their bravery and unique fighting style called Paika Akhada, were the backbone of Odisha’s defense. However, when the British East India Company seized Odisha from the Marathas in 1803, they disrupted the region’s social, economic, and political fabric. The Paikas, once honored with rent-free lands (nish-kar jagirs), faced oppression and humiliation under British policies. At the heart of this storm stood Bakshi Jagabandhu, the military commander of the Khurda king, whose leadership ignited the Paika Rebellion in 1817—a movement that challenged British supremacy nearly four decades before the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857.

The rebellion was a response to years of injustice, sparked by economic exploitation, cultural disregard, and personal grievances. It united people from all walks of Odia society—Paikas, zamindars, tribal communities, and common folk—under the banner of resistance. Though it did not achieve its ultimate goal, the Paika Rebellion left an indelible mark on India’s freedom struggle, earning recognition as a precursor to later uprisings.

Reasons for the Inception of the Paika Rebellion

The Paika Rebellion was not a sudden outburst but the culmination of deep-seated grievances against British colonial policies. The following factors fueled the fire of discontent:

1. Economic Exploitation and Land Revenue Policies

Seizure of Rent-Free Lands: The Paikas were traditionally granted hereditary rent-free lands in exchange for their military services. After conquering Odisha in 1803, the British, under Major Fletcher, confiscated these lands, deeming Paika services unnecessary. This policy stripped the Paikas, including Bakshi Jagabandhu, of their livelihood, reducing many to poverty. Jagabandhu’s family estate, Killa Rorang, was seized in 1814, plunging him into financial distress.

New Revenue Settlements: The British introduced a land revenue system that required payments in silver, replacing the traditional cowrie currency. This made taxes expensive and burdensome for farmers and zamindars. The settlements favored absentee Bengali landlords, marginalizing local Odia proprietors and ryots (peasants).

Salt Monopoly: The British imposed a ban on making salt from seawater, a common practice in Odisha, and established a monopoly that skyrocketed salt prices. This affected the poor and added to their misery.

2. Political Oppression and Dethronement of the Raja

The British dethroned Raja Mukunda Deva II, the last king of Khurda, in 1803 and confiscated his estate in 1804 after a failed rebellion attempt. This act humiliated the Paikas, who saw the king as a symbol of Odia pride. The British placed Khurda under direct management, eroding the traditional power structure.

The hanging of Jayi Rajaguru, the king’s minister, in 1804 for resisting British rule, further enraged the Paikas and sowed seeds of rebellion.

3. Social and Cultural Disrespect

The British showed little regard for Odisha’s cultural and religious traditions. Their interference in the management of the Jagannath Temple in Puri, a sacred site for Odias, hurt local sentiments. The Paikas, deeply connected to Lord Jagannath, viewed this as an insult to their identity.

The introduction of a new currency system and the closure of Odisha’s trading ports disrupted local commerce, alienating traders and the mercantile community.

4. Personal Grievances of Bakshi Jagabandhu

Jagabandhu, born into an aristocratic Khandayat family, inherited the title of Buxi, making him the commander of the Khurda king’s forces. The loss of his estate and false accusations linking him to the Pindaris (a bandit group) pushed him to the brink. The British-appointed officials, like Charan Patnaik, harassed him, adding insult to injury. These personal injustices transformed Jagabandhu into the rebellion’s natural leader.

5. Broader Discontent and Tribal Support

The arrival of 400 Khonds (tribal warriors) from Ghumusar in March 1817, openly declaring their intent to overthrow British rule, acted as a catalyst. Their call for liberation resonated with the Paikas, who joined hands with them. The rebellion thus gained a broader base, uniting diverse groups against a common enemy.

These reasons—economic hardship, political suppression, cultural disregard, and personal grievances—created a powder keg of resentment. Bakshi Jagabandhu, with his charisma and military expertise, lit the spark that set Odisha ablaze.

The Course of the Paika Rebellion

The Paika Rebellion unfolded with remarkable speed and intensity, spreading across Odisha like wildfire. Under Bakshi Jagabandhu’s leadership, it became a symbol of unity and resistance. Here is a detailed account of its course:

1. The Spark at Banapur (March 1817)

The rebellion began on March 29, 1817, when 400 Khonds from Ghumusar marched into Banapur, Khurda, proclaiming their intent to free Odisha from British rule. Bakshi Jagabandhu, supported by the Paikas and local leaders like the Dalabeheras, joined them.

The rebels attacked British symbols of power, setting fire to the police station and post office in Banapur, killing around 100 men, and looting the government treasury. This bold act signaled the start of an armed uprising.

2. March to Khurda and Widespread Support

The rebels advanced to Khurda, where they sacked administrative buildings and the treasury. The British abandoned Khurda, unable to resist the Paikas’ ferocity. The uprising gained momentum as zamindars from Karipur, Mrichpur, Golra, Balarampur, Budnakera, and Rupasa, along with rajas from Kanika, Kujang, Nayagarh, and Ghumusur, pledged their support.

Common people, including peasants and tribal communities, joined the rebellion, making it a mass movement. Dalabehera Mirhaidar Alli, a Muslim rebel from Jadupur, also played a key role, showcasing the uprising’s inclusivity.

3. Capture of Puri and Guerrilla Tactics

By April 1817, the rebels, led by Jagabandhu, captured Puri, a significant cultural and strategic center. The British forces retreated to Cuttack, cut off from southern Odisha. Jagabandhu offered to reinstate Raja Mukunda Deva as the king of Khurda, but the exiled king, fearing British retaliation, refused and surrendered to the Company.

The Paikas attacked police stations, administrative offices, and treasuries across Puri, Pipili, Cuttack, and remote villages like Kanika, Kujang, and Pattamundai. They erected barricades, such as at Gangapara Pass, to block British advances.

After initial setbacks, the Paikas retreated into Odisha’s dense jungles, adopting guerrilla warfare tactics. They continued to harass British forces for years, striking from hidden bases.

4. British Counteroffensive

The British, led by magistrate E. Impey in Cuttack, responded by dispatching troops under Lieutenant Prideaure to Khurda and Lieutenant Faris to Pipli in early April. However, the rebels’ early successes overwhelmed these forces.

By mid-April, Captain Le Fevere led a counteroffensive, defeating a 1,000-strong Paika force and recapturing Puri. The British arrested Raja Mukunda Deva, who died in captivity in November 1817.

By May 1817, the East India Company regained control of most of Odisha, but the rebellion persisted through guerrilla attacks until 1819. The British conducted operations in Khurda’s jungles between 1818 and 1826 to capture remaining rebels.

5. Surrender of Bakshi Jagabandhu

Despite prolonged resistance, Bakshi Jagabandhu faced successive defeats. In May 1825, he surrendered to the British in Cuttack under negotiated terms. He lived as a prisoner until his death in 1829. His surrender marked the end of the Paika Rebellion, though smaller uprisings by the Kandhas and Koi tribes continued.

The rebellion’s course was a saga of bravery, unity, and resilience. Though the Paikas could not match the British in resources or training, their spirit of defiance inspired future generations.

Results and Significance of the Paika Rebellion

The Paika Rebellion did not achieve its immediate objectives, but its impact reverberated through history. The outcomes were both immediate and long-lasting:

1. Immediate Outcomes

Suppression and Punishment: The British crushed the rebellion by May 1817, sentencing captured rebels to death, long-term imprisonment, or penal transportation. Priests at the Jagannath Temple, who sheltered Jagabandhu, were caught and hanged.

Commission of Inquiry: The British appointed a commission under Walter Ewer to investigate the rebellion’s causes. Though it acknowledged the Paikas’ grievances, the revenue and taxation policies remained unchanged, perpetuating discontent.

Administrative Reforms: To prevent future uprisings, the British restructured their administration in Odisha under Commissioner Robert Ker. A new settlement with fixed tenure was introduced, but it failed to address core issues like the salt monopoly or land revenue burdens.

2. Long-Term Significance

Symbol of Resistance: The Paika Rebellion is celebrated as a precursor to India’s freedom struggle. It united diverse groups—Paikas, zamindars, tribals, and peasants—under the banner of Lord Jagannath, symbolizing Odia unity and nationalism.

Inspiration for Future Uprisings: Though less known than the 1857 Revolt, the Paika Rebellion inspired later peasant and tribal movements. Its guerrilla tactics and mass participation set a template for anti-colonial resistance.

Recognition and Commemoration: In 2017, marking its 200th anniversary, Prime Minister Narendra Modi honored descendants of rebel families and released a commemorative stamp and coin. The Union Budget of 2017–18 announced plans for a Paika Rebellion Chair at Utkal University, Bhubaneswar.

Debate on “First War of Independence”: Odisha’s government and communities have demanded that the Paika Rebellion be recognized as India’s first war of independence, predating 1857. While the Indian Council of Historical Research (ICHR) declined this status in 2021, citing earlier rebellions, it acknowledged the uprising’s role as a “beginning of popular uprisings” and included it as a case study in NCERT’s Class VIII history textbook.

3. Legacy of Bakshi Jagabandhu

Jagabandhu’s leadership transformed him into a folk hero. His courage and sacrifice are immortalized in Odisha’s history, with institutions like BJB College in Bhubaneswar named after him.

His inclusive approach, rallying people across caste, creed, and religion, highlighted the power of unity in the face of oppression.

4. Cultural and Regional Impact

The rebellion strengthened Odia identity, with Lord Jagannath emerging as a unifying symbol. It fostered a sense of regional pride that continues to inspire Odisha’s cultural narrative.

The Paika Akhada, the traditional martial art of the Paikas, gained renewed attention, preserving Odisha’s warrior heritage.

Conclusion: A Beacon of Bravery

The Paika Rebellion of 1817, under the indomitable leadership of Bakshi Jagabandhu, was a shining chapter in India’s fight for freedom. Born from the ashes of economic hardship, political oppression, and cultural disrespect, it was a bold stand against British tyranny. Though the rebellion was quelled, its spirit lived on, inspiring countless others to dream of a free India. The Paikas’ courage, Jagabandhu’s leadership, and the unity of Odisha’s people made the rebellion a milestone in the nation’s history.

 

The Pabna Agrarian League (1873–1885): A Peasant Movement for Justice

 

The Pabna Agrarian League (1873–1885): A Peasant Movement for Justice

The Pabna Agrarian League, formed in 1873 in the Yusufshahi Pargana of Pabna district (now in Sirajganj, Bangladesh), was a significant peasant uprising against the oppressive practices of zamindars in colonial Bengal. Spanning from 1873 to 1885, this movement stood out for its organized, largely peaceful resistance and its focus on securing tenant rights. Led by figures like Ishan Chandra Roy, fondly called the "Bidrohi Raja" (Rebel King), and Khoodi Mollah, a Muslim jotedar, the League united peasants across religious lines to challenge exploitation. This note explores the reasons for its inception, the course of the movement, and its lasting results, written in simple, engaging language for competitive exam preparation.

Reasons for the Inception of the Pabna Agrarian League

The Pabna Agrarian League emerged as a response to deep-rooted grievances faced by peasants under the zamindari system introduced by the British Permanent Settlement of 1793. Several factors fueled the unrest, making the formation of the League a necessity for the struggling ryots (peasants). Here are the key reasons:

Oppressive Zamindari Practices:

The Permanent Settlement gave zamindars (landlords) absolute control over land, turning peasants into tenants who paid rent. Zamindars exploited this power by imposing exorbitant rents and illegal cesses called abwabs.

They often evicted tenants on false pretexts, such as non-payment of rent, to prevent them from gaining occupancy rights under Act X of 1859. This act allowed tenants who held land for 12 continuous years and paid rent to claim occupancy rights, but zamindars disrupted this by forcibly removing peasants.

Violent tactics, like seizing crops, cattle, or dragging tenants into costly lawsuits, were common, leaving peasants in distress.

Economic Hardships and Famine:

The 1870s were a challenging time for Bengal’s peasants, particularly in Pabna, a region heavily reliant on jute production. Jute was in high demand globally, but low rainfall, adverse weather, and limited land and capital reduced output, leading to economic strain.

The famine of 1873–74 worsened the situation, causing food shortages and widespread poverty. Despite these hardships, zamindars continued to demand high rents and even raised taxes, pushing peasants to the brink of survival.

The economic vulnerability made peasants resent the lack of government support and the zamindars’ relentless greed.

Denial of Legal Rights:

Act X of 1859 was meant to protect tenants by granting occupancy rights, but zamindars found loopholes to undermine it. They refused to issue leases for the same plot for 12 years or evicted tenants before they could qualify.

The zamindars’ actions violated the legal grounds for rent enhancement outlined in the Act, which allowed increases only if the rent was lower than neighboring areas, if produce value rose, or if tenants paid below fair rates. Instead, zamindars raised rents arbitrarily.

Rise of Peasant Awareness:

The peasants of Pabna, many of whom were Muslims, were influenced by earlier reform movements like the Faraizi Movement, which emphasized social justice and resistance to oppression. Leaders like Naya Miya, son of Faraizi leader Dudu Miya, supported agrarian combinations in nearby areas, inspiring Pabna’s peasants.

Educated intermediaries, such as jotedars (rich peasants), village headmen, and local leaders like Ishan Chandra Roy and Khoodi Mollah, played a crucial role in organizing the peasants. Their awareness of legal rights and ability to rally the community gave the movement momentum.

Support from Intellectuals:

Prominent Bengali intellectuals like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, Romesh Chunder Dutt, and Surendranath Banerjee sympathized with the peasants’ plight. Their writings, speeches, and advocacy highlighted the injustices of the zamindari system, encouraging peasants to resist.

The Indian Association, led by Surendranath Banerjee, later organized tenant rights campaigns, amplifying the Pabna movement’s message.

These reasons combined to create a volatile environment where peasants could no longer tolerate exploitation. The formation of the Pabna Agrarian League in May 1873 was a bold step to reclaim their rights and dignity.

Course of the Pabna Agrarian League

The Pabna Agrarian League was a well-organized movement that evolved from peaceful resistance to a broader struggle, though it remained largely non-violent. Its course can be traced through key phases and actions, led by charismatic leaders like Ishan Chandra Roy, Khoodi Mollah, and Shambhu Nath Pal.

Formation and Early Organization (May 1873):

The League was formed in Yusufshahi Pargana, where new zamindars, who had purchased parts of the Natore Raj, intensified oppression. Ishan Chandra Roy, a petty landholder, emerged as the central leader, earning the title "Bidrohi Raja" for his fearless defiance.

Khoodi Mollah, a Muslim jotedar, and Shambhu Nath Pal, a village headman, were key allies, ensuring the movement crossed religious divides. This unity was notable, as most peasants were Muslim, while zamindars were predominantly Hindu, yet communal tensions were absent.

The League held mass meetings, where large groups of peasants gathered to discuss grievances, raise funds, and plan resistance. These gatherings boosted morale and attracted more ryots to join.

Legal Resistance and Rent Strikes:

The movement’s primary strategy was legal resistance. Peasants refused to pay enhanced rents and illegal cesses, organizing rent strikes to pressure zamindars. They also took zamindars to court, using Act X of 1859 to defend their occupancy rights.

Funds raised by the League supported legal battles, making it possible for poor peasants to challenge wealthy landlords. This approach was effective, as zamindars feared lengthy, costly litigation.

The League’s actions spread beyond Pabna to other East Bengal districts, inspiring similar agrarian combinations.

Declaration of Independence and Rebel Army:

As the League grew stronger, it took bold steps. Leaders declared their parganas independent of zamindari control, envisioning a local government free from landlord oppression.

A "rebel army" was formed to counter zamindari lathials (armed clubmen). Trusted deputies were appointed to manage various departments, and the army was stationed strategically across the district. While largely symbolic, this show of strength intimidated zamindars.

Though the movement started peacefully, some clashes occurred as tensions escalated, particularly when zamindars used force to collect rents.

Government Intervention (July 1873):

The League’s activities threatened public peace, prompting the British colonial government to intervene. On July 4, 1873, Sir George Campbell, the Lieutenant Governor of Bengal, issued a proclamation supporting peasants against excessive zamindari demands. He advised zamindars to use legal means to assert their claims.

The government’s stance was partly motivated by the need to maintain order and secure peasant loyalty, as the British relied on land revenue. However, when violence erupted, the government deployed police to suppress unrest, arresting several peasants.

Impact of Famine and Decline (1873–1885):

The famine of 1873–74 severely weakened the movement, as peasants struggled to survive food shortages and economic hardship. The League’s momentum slowed, and many peasants could not sustain their resistance.

Despite this, discontent simmered until 1885, with sporadic protests and legal battles. The government’s promise to address tenant grievances through legislation kept hopes alive.

Role of Intellectuals and Broader Influence:

Intellectuals like Romesh Chunder Dutt, in his book Peasantry of Bengal (1874), and the Indian Association’s campaigns, highlighted the Pabna movement’s significance. Their support gave the League legitimacy and inspired other peasant movements.

The movement’s emphasis on collective action and legal resistance set a model for future agrarian struggles in India.

The course of the Pabna Agrarian League was marked by unity, strategic planning, and resilience, despite challenges like famine and government crackdowns. Its leaders, particularly Ishan Chandra Roy and Khoodi Mollah, played a pivotal role in mobilizing peasants and sustaining the fight for justice.

Results of the Pabna Agrarian League

The Pabna Agrarian League had far-reaching consequences, both immediate and long-term, that transformed the agrarian landscape of Bengal and influenced India’s broader freedom struggle. Its results can be summarized as follows:

Introduction of the Bengal Tenancy Act (1885):

The most significant outcome was the passage of the Bengal Tenancy Act in 1885. This legislation addressed key peasant grievances by regulating landlord-tenant relationships and protecting occupancy rights.

The Act limited zamindars’ ability to impose arbitrary rent increases and illegal cesses, ensuring tenants could not be evicted without legal grounds. It also clarified the rights of both zamindars and ryots, reducing exploitation.

While not perfect, the Act was a direct result of the pressure exerted by the Pabna movement and marked a victory for peasant advocacy.

Reduction in Rents and Illegal Cesses:

The League’s rent strikes and legal battles forced many zamindars to negotiate. Rents were reduced in several areas, and illegal cesses (abwabs) were abolished, providing immediate relief to peasants.

The collective action demonstrated the power of united resistance, compelling zamindars to reconsider their oppressive practices.

Strengthening of Peasant Solidarity:

The movement fostered a sense of unity and collective identity among peasants, transcending religious and social divides. The leadership of Ishan Chandra Roy, Khoodi Mollah, and Shambhu Nath Pal showed that diverse communities could work together for a common cause.

This solidarity inspired other peasant movements across India, such as the Deccan Riots and later the Tebhaga Movement, emphasizing the importance of collective action.

Influence on Nationalist Movement:

The Pabna Agrarian League caught the attention of nationalist leaders like Surendranath Banerjee and Bankim Chandra Chatterjee. It highlighted the need to address agrarian issues within the broader struggle against colonial rule.

The movement’s success in pressuring the government showed that organized resistance could yield results, encouraging nationalists to integrate peasant concerns into their agenda.

Empowerment of Rural Leadership:

Leaders like Ishan Chandra Roy and Khoodi Mollah emerged as symbols of resistance, proving that local leaders could mobilize communities effectively. Their roles as jotedars and village headmen bridged the gap between peasants and the colonial administration.

The involvement of Muslim leaders like Khoodi Mollah also highlighted the role of religious and community elders in agrarian movements, paving the way for future Muslim-led peasant struggles.

Long-Term Impact on Agrarian Reforms:

The Pabna movement set a precedent for post-independence land reforms, such as the abolition of the zamindari system in the 1950s. It created an atmosphere where peasant rights became a priority for policymakers.

The movement’s emphasis on legal resistance and tenant rights influenced the discourse on agrarian justice, shaping policies in colonial and independent India.

Challenges and Limitations:

Despite its achievements, the movement faced setbacks. The famine of 1873–74 and police actions weakened its momentum, and not all peasant demands were fully met.

The Bengal Tenancy Act, while progressive, did not eliminate all forms of exploitation, and zamindars continued to wield significant power in some areas.

Conclusion

The Pabna Agrarian League (1873–1885) was a shining example of peasant resilience and unity in the face of oppression. Driven by the leadership of Ishan Chandra Roy, Khoodi Mollah, and others, it challenged the exploitative zamindari system and secured significant reforms, most notably the Bengal Tenancy Act of 1885. The movement’s roots lay in economic hardship, famine, and the denial of legal rights, but its success came from organized resistance, legal battles, and intellectual support. Its legacy lived on in stronger peasant solidarity, nationalist awakening, and lasting agrarian reforms. For students preparing for competitive exams, the Pabna Agrarian League is a testament to the power of collective action and the enduring fight for justice.